temporalvsWhatomate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Whatomate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #37 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 24 054 | 1 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +776 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 53/100 for Whatomate, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whatomate.
If you want the quickest setup, Whatomate is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Whatomate details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Whatomate, compare it with