temporalvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 24 047 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +787 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with