temporalvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 039 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +779 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.
If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with