temporalvsWallos
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Wallos | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #1 of 5 in Finance |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 | 8 761 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +771 | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 36 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v5.10.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 67/100 for Wallos, so it is the safer default.
Wallos ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Wallos is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Wallos details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Wallos, compare it with