temporalvsvoice-chat-ai
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | voice-chat-ai | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #41 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 24 057 | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +779 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 46/100 for voice-chat-ai, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for voice-chat-ai.
If you want the quickest setup, voice-chat-ai is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →voice-chat-ai details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep voice-chat-ai, compare it with