temporalvsVintrack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Vintrack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #3 of 6 in Feed Aggregator |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +771 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.7.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 49/100 for Vintrack, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Vintrack.
temporal is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Vintrack details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Vintrack, compare it with