temporalvsUnregistry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Unregistry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #4 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 24 063 | 4 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +785 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.4.3 · 12 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 63/100 for Unregistry, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Unregistry.
If you want the quickest setup, Unregistry is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Unregistry details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Unregistry, compare it with