temporalvsuMap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | uMap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 24 047 | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +787 | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.
uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →uMap details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep uMap, compare it with