temporalvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 24 059 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +781 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with