temporalvstootik
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | tootik | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 24 059 | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +781 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.25.5 · 3 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 47/100 for tootik, so it is the safer default.
tootik ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, tootik is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →tootik details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep tootik, compare it with