temporalvstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 24 065 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +787 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →textsnap details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with