TeleportvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Teleport | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 40 in Authentication | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 21 040 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Teleport scores 76/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
Teleport is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).
Teleport details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Teleport, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with