supabasevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 114 248 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 539 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with