Technitium DNS Servervszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Technitium DNS Server | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 248 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +267 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Technitium DNS Server ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+267 stars in 30 days).
Technitium DNS Server details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Technitium DNS Server, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with