sysmonvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sysmon | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #85 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 201 | 24 069 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +791 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | CSS | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 41/100 for sysmon, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sysmon.
If you want the quickest setup, sysmon is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+791 stars in 30 days).
sysmon details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep sysmon, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with