Syslog-ngvstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Syslog-ng | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Logging | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 2 386 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; Syslog-ng needs more configuration.
Syslog-ng is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
Syslog-ng details →textsnap details →
Swap a project
Keep Syslog-ng, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with