OpenSearchvstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenSearch | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 41 in Search Engines | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 13 932 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.19.7 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenSearch scores 76/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
OpenSearch ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; OpenSearch needs more configuration.
OpenSearch is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
OpenSearch details →textsnap details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenSearch, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with