SyncWatch同步观影vsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SyncWatch同步观影 | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 140 | 56 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).
SyncWatch同步观影 details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep SyncWatch同步观影, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with