supervsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| super | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 34 in Network Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 875 | 89 739 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 400 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 17 |
| Latest release | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.
super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, super is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 400 stars in 30 days).
super details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep super, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with