supervstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| super | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 34 in Network Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 875 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 11 |
| Latest release | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.
super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, super is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
super details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep super, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with