Super Productivityvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Super Productivity | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in Task Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 223 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 002 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 002 stars in 30 days).
Super Productivity details →zookeeper details →