supabasevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 114 278 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 530 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with