supabasevswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with