supabasevsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 114 258 | 2 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 549 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with