clickhousevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 50 650 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +609 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 9 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
clickhouse scores 87/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.
clickhouse is growing faster right now (+609 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →UUSEC WAF details →