supabasevsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 295 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 547 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for UmlautAdaptarr.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →UmlautAdaptarr details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep UmlautAdaptarr, compare it with