supabasevstranscriber
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | transcriber | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 114 286 | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 538 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.
If you want the quickest setup, transcriber is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 538 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →transcriber details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep transcriber, compare it with