supabasevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 114 252 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 543 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with