clickhousevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clickhouse | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 50 650 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +609 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 180 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2.103-stable · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
clickhouse scores 87/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
clickhouse ships more often: 180 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; clickhouse needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
clickhouse details →TradingAgents details →