supabasevsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 248 | 23 217 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 539 | +996 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 22 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Super Productivity details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Super Productivity, compare it with