supabase-automated-self-hostvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase-automated-self-host | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 53 722 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).
supabase-automated-self-host details →WindowsinDocker details →