sunavsWOML
Two self-hosted n8n alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| suna | WOML | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 209 in AI Agents | #21 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 20 326 | 156 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 150 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.14.8 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
suna scores 71/100 against 46/100 for WOML, so it is the safer default.
suna ships more often: 150 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WOML.
If you want the quickest setup, WOML is easier to run; suna needs more configuration.
suna is growing faster right now (+93 stars in 30 days).
suna details →WOML details → All n8n alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep suna, compare it with
Keep WOML, compare it with