StreamFlowvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| StreamFlow | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 36 in Video Streaming | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 406 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.2 · 11 Jan 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | EJS | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 50/100 for StreamFlow, so it is the safer default.
StreamFlow ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; StreamFlow needs more configuration.
StreamFlow details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep StreamFlow, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with