Stirling-PDFvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 95 252 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 339 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with