Stirling-PDFvsYarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | Yarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 95 280 | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 318 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 318 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →Yarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep Yarr, compare it with