Stirling-PDFvswebstudio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | webstudio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 6 in Website Builder |
| GitHub stars | 95 280 | 9 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 318 | +142 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 58 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | 0.308.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 69/100 for webstudio, so it is the safer default.
webstudio ships more often: 58 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; webstudio needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 318 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →webstudio details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep webstudio, compare it with