Stirling-PDFvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 95 261 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 348 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 348 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with