Stirling-PDFvsUnregistry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | Unregistry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 95 319 | 4 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 357 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.4.3 · 12 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 63/100 for Unregistry, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Unregistry.
If you want the quickest setup, Unregistry is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →Unregistry details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep Unregistry, compare it with