Stirling-PDFvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 95 299 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 337 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with