statusnookvsvLLM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| statusnook | vLLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 988 | 95 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
vLLM scores 91/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; vLLM needs more configuration.
vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 157 stars in 30 days).
statusnook details →vLLM details →
Swap a project
Keep statusnook, compare it with
Keep vLLM, compare it with