StatusvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Status | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 317 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 45/100 for Status, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Status.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Status needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep Status, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with