static_statusvsWeKnora
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | WeKnora | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 35 862 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +989 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.9.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
WeKnora scores 83/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
WeKnora ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; WeKnora needs more configuration.
WeKnora is growing faster right now (+989 stars in 30 days).
static_status details →WeKnora details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep WeKnora, compare it with