static_statusvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
static_status details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with