static_statusvsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 60 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 635 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 635 stars in 30 days).
static_status details →Twenty details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep Twenty, compare it with