static_statusvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
static_status details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with