static_statusvstidb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | tidb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 40 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
tidb scores 80/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
tidb ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.
tidb is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).
static_status details →tidb details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep tidb, compare it with