static_statusvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 114 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 539 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
static_status details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with