StashvsUglyFeed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | UglyFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +298 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 1 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →UglyFeed details →