cobaltvsUglyFeed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | UglyFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 45 600 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 790 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Svelte | Python |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
UglyFeed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.
cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 790 stars in 30 days).
cobalt details →UglyFeed details →