StashvsThingport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | Thingport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #14 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 13 309 | 244 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +299 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | extension-latest · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 49/100 for Thingport, so it is the safer default.
Thingport ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Thingport needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →Thingport details →